Personalized Politics

Personalized Politics

We have entered the age of personalized politics, and it is very important for us to understand what that means. In practice, there are as many candidates in the 2020 presidential race as there are voters with online access in the United States. Every candidate is a customized persona created specifically for us by a complex set of algorithms that very few people fully understand. This means we are all test subjects in an unprecedented sociopolitical experiment that, quite frankly, scares the hell out of me.

AI is empowering each candidate to present themselves as if that candidate were speaking to us one-on-one. This has always been possible in small groups or at political rallies. But no politician in history has had the ability to speak to every individual voter one-on-one. Human politicians still can’t, but their AI-generated political avatars can. And frighteningly, these AI-generated political avatars know more about our real hopes and dreams than any human candidate ever could.

Where does XYZ Candidate stand on universal healthcare, reproductive rights, tax reform, the environment, gun violence prevention? Ask 100 million people, and you’ll get a 100 million answers informed by customized messaging. This is truly new. Here’s how it’s done.

Data You Don’t Even Know You Generate

Whenever you interact with an app (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Google) or website or any other online data aggregator (Nest, Alexa, Waze, your smartphone), you are creating two sets of data. The first set of data is the data required to enable the technology you are using to work. This might include the location of your device, if you’re using Waze or your smartphone. Or the current temperature of your home, if you’re using a Nest thermostat. Or what you are interested in at the moment, if you are using Facebook, Amazon, Google, Instagram, Twitter, etc.

But you also create a second set of data. Sometimes referred to as “surplus data,” these data are not specifically required to achieve your immediate objective – for example, your location when you tap a like button, or the time of day you are usually in your home when you adjust your thermostat, or the kinds of images that get your attention when you stop scrolling on a social network.

Surplus data are collected with the explicit purpose of improving the engineering of bespoke online environments and messaging that you will find irresistible. Said differently, these are the data used by algorithms to feed your social media addiction.

Personalizing Your Politics

The goal of all targeted messaging (in fact, the goal of all advertising ever created) is simple: put the right message in front of the right person in the right place at the right time. This is not new, and it is not news.

But AI has changed the game. The amount of data (big data) that is available about each and every one of us is simply staggering. Using data we willingly contribute to data-rich organizations such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter, any candidate can appear to you to be a champion for the causes or issues you are most passionate about.

Convincing a single-issue voter that a candidate believes what that voter believes is truly child’s play. But life is not that simple. Most voters are not single-issue. Most voters are nuanced and passionate about lots of issues.

Pandering at Scale

To customize messaging for multi-issue voters, behavioral data are fed into algorithms designed to score those behaviors and then predict what attributes should be crafted into the customized persona of the particular candidate. You can call it “pandering at scale.” While this technology is table stakes in best practices digital advertising, dynamic apps, and websites, it is relatively new for politicians. They may be late to the game, but they are now using the schooling they received in 2016, and we’re about to get an up close and personal view of the unintended consequences of the lessons learned.

What’s to Be Done about It?

We all love to be blanketed in the comfort of the information we want to hear. But for the 2020 elections, we’re going to have to get out of our comfort zones. If you feel strongly about an issue, go visit some politician’s website in incognito mode. No cookie? No personalization. Don’t rely on inbound messaging; formulate questions and go seek the answers.

The 2020 elections are going to be politically, technically, and physically hacked, and there is almost nothing any of us can do about it. But they are also going to be socially hacked. On that front, critical thinking, Socratic debate, and dogged pursuit of the truth are our best weapons – we need to use them.

Lastly, it is dangerously naive to believe that breaking up Facebook or Google (or any other big tech company) will somehow magically solve the societal issues we are facing due to the insane use and misuse of big data. Breaking up big tech will certainly not have an impact on AI-generated political avatars or customized campaigning for 2020.

We are going to have to figure out some thoughtful, future-focused way to frame the conversation around data regulation. And while I do not think our current elected officials are the right people for the job, we do get to make a choice every Election Day. That is what truly makes America great.

Author’s note: This is not a sponsored post. I am the author of this article and it expresses my own opinions. I am not, nor is my company, receiving compensation for it.

Get Briefed Every Day!

Subscribe to my daily newsletter featuring current events and the top stories in technology, media, and marketing.

Subscribe